With all due respect to L.A. County District Attorney Jackie Lacey for launching a corruption probe, the Coalition to Preserve LA is calling on Asst. US Attorney Brandon Fox (Public Corruption Section) and California Attorney General (Special Investigations Team) to investigate whether City Hall leaders, in ex parte meetings, sell their votes to developers seeking “spot zoning” that enriches the developers.

In the wake of an L.A. Times probe this week into “Sea Breeze” — a stinking wind that the Times editorial board calls “an indictment of a corrupt City Hall culture in City Hall” — the Coalition urges an investigation well beyond the Sea Breeze Scandal, led by prosecutors well outside of the Los Angeles political system.

The Coalition, sponsor of the Neighborhood Integrity Initiative on the ballot next March, is now delivering official requests to Kamala Harris, Brandon Fox and Jackie Lacey. They seek a broad probe of “spot zoning,” the backroom, money-greased City Hall system that placed the Sea Breeze apartments in a manufacturing area, which zoning prohibits.

Sea Breeze sailed past L.A. city planners and appointees who tried to stop the wildly inappropriate “zone change.” Meanwhile, $600,000 appeared in the coffers of the City Hall elected leaders who pushed it through.

The Coalition request, being delivered to Brandon Fox, Kamala Harris and Jackie Lacey, says in part:

“We request you investigate evidence, in the Times piece, of money-laundering to benefit politicians, a criminal act. …

“In addition to the appearance, and possible reality, of vote-selling and money laundering involving Los Angeles city officials in the Sea Breeze and other controversial “spot zoning” changes, we believe there is strong evidence that elected officials are illegally disregarding the Los Angeles City Charter in order to pursue “spot zoning” that financially advantages the very elected officials and other officials who give these approvals. …

“We believe an investigation into L.A.’s spot zoning is justified and request it be done. California Government Code section 1222, Willful Omission to Perform Duty, states: ‘Every willful omission to perform any duty enjoined by law upon any public officer, or person holding any public trust or employment, where no special provision is made for the punishment of such delinquency, is punishable as a misdemeanor.’”

As the Coalition has noted before, Los Angeles in 2016 resembles L.A. of the 1960s, when decisions about how to shape communities were made in smoke-filled rooms by city officials, planners and developers.

Greedy developers back then sought rezoning for their individual projects without regard to the environmental effects upon neighborhoods, traffic or infrastructure.

And they got it.

In the bad old days, during the rezoning scandals of 1966 through 1970, a grand jury found evidence that L.A.’s planning and zoning process was corrupt, and news media covered the juicy story — and the convictions for bribery and corruption that followed.

At the sentencing of a corrupt Los Angeles city councilman, then-Superior Court Judge Pearce Young, himself a former state assemblyman, warned that the power to rezone individual parcels of land was “the power to create great wealth.”

We’re back at that low 1960s point of growing greed and easy corruption today.

L.A. leaders who fight “spot zoning” that gridlock our streets, ruins neighborhood character and is displacing thousands of families and businesses, are demanding this broad, outside, fully independent investigation.

Damien Goodmon, executive director of the nonprofit Crenshaw Subway Coalition, said, “Bring in the independent special prosecutor.”

Cindy Chvatal, president of the Hancock Park Homeowners Association, said, “An outside investigation of spot zoning and campaign donation practices at City Hall is desperately needed. The city cannot investigate itself, we need a complete, independent investigation.”

Richard Close, president of the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association, said, “Residents of the San Fernando Valley have long suspected that votes were for sale at City Hall. The Los Angeles Times article proves that developers can purchase votes with campaign contributions.”

Join the Coalition to Preserve L.A. by clicking here right now to donate any amount you wish, and follow and cheer our efforts on FacebookTwitter and Instagram. You can also send us an email at neighborhoodintegrity@gmail.com for more information.

More News You May Like

LA City Council Delivers Favors to Paramount Pictures, Ignoring Residents’ Conc... The Los Angeles City Council approved today a major redevelopment of the Paramount Pictures campus at 5555 Melrose Avenue, despite residents' worries ...
Coalition to Preserve L.A. Responds to Mayor Eric Garcetti’s ‘Reform̵... In a major nod to the efforts of the Coalition to Preserve L.A., a citizen-driven, community-based movement, the L.A. City Council and Mayor Eric Garc...
Will Los Angeles Turn Into a City Filled with Luxury Ghost Towers? The Wall Street Journal recently noted that "the apartment-building boom is running into a supply problem," which is driven by the fact that develope...
Los Angeles Times Exposes How Sea Breeze Developer Used Campaign Cash to Get City Hal... On Sunday, the Los Angeles Times published a damning, in-depth report about Sea Breeze developer Samuel Leung and his associates who greased L.A.'s ri...
Pulitzer Prize-Winning David Horsey Perfectly Illustrates Why We Need the Neighborhoo... What may be one of the best, most concise explanations for why Angelenos need to vote for the Neighborhood Integrity Initiative in March 2017, the Los...


Comments